Gender Identity and Agency of Women in a Higher Education Institution
Abstract
In higher education institutions, we find that there is a dearth of women in decision-making positions. Public universities, as an example, promote the gender roles of both men and women. This research examined the gender performativity of six female faculty members at a Saudi public university. using a methodology of a qualitative case study, utilizing methods of interviews, observations, and documentation. In this research, I answered the question of how do female faculty members perform their gender at their university? I utilized the theory of gender performativity to answer this question. Gender performativity theory believes that, gender is socially constructed through gendered performances. The theory helped to understand why female faculty members build and maintain gender norms in the university. Moreover, the research exposed the effect of gender performativity on how the job opportunities distributed in the women’s workplace. The. findings were mainly in the areas of: (1) gender identity; (2) women’s agency; (3) and regulatory power.
References
2. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
3. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. Routledge.
4. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
5. Denker, K. J. (2009). Doing gender in the academy: The challenges for women in the academic organization. Women and Language, 32(1), 103-112.
6. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction. (Vol. 1). Pantheon Books.
7. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
8. Foucault, M., Martin, L., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. (1988). Technologies of the self. Tavistock Publications.
9. Kelly-Ware, J. (2016). ‘What’s he doing that for? he’s a boy!’: Exploring gender and sexualities in an early childhood setting. Global Studies of Childhood, 6(1), 147-154.
10. Martin, P. (2003). Said and Done Versus Saying and Doing. Gender & Society, 17(3), 342-366. doi: 10.1177/0891243203017003002
11. Masuchika Boldt, G. (2004). Performing gender in the elementary classroom. Occasional Paper Series, 2004 (12), 5-22. Retrieved from https://educate.bankstreet.edu/occasional-paper-series/vol2004/iss12/2
12. Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
13. Ministry of Education. (2016). Directory of equivalence for pre undergraduate degrees. Ministry of Education Publications.
14. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University history. (2020, March 2). pnu.edu.sa. Retrieved 2 March 2020, from https://www.pnu.edu.sa/en/pages/home.aspx
15. Saudi Vision 2030. ((Year, Month Date) 2020). Vision 2030. Retrieved February 10, 2020, from https://vision2030.gov.sa/en
16. Silfver, E. (2019). Gender performance in an out-of-school science context. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(1), 139-155.
17. Tyler, M., & Cohen, L. (2010). Spaces that matter: Gender performativity and organizational space. Organization Studies, 31(2), 175-198. doi: 10.1177/0170840609357381
18. Woolcock, A. Joseph. (1985). Politics, ideology and hegemony in Gramsci's theory. Social and Economic Studies, 34(3), 199-210.
19. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research and applications. SAGE.
