Evaluating Evidence Grading Scales

Abstract

In terms of Qur’anic principles and Sunni branches, a set of factors are mentioned in the texts, which are the Qur’an, the Sunnah, and conscience, and also a consideration of customary acceptability and a presentation of positive knowledge and the degree of approval. As for what is famous, there is a consideration of the source of the evidence, the degree of its supererogation, the strength of its significance, its fame, and the fame of its statement. Here is an experimental research according to the foundations of experimental jurisprudence to demonstrate the efficiency and strength of these advanced factors in evaluating the consideration of evidence.

Through the potential usefulness and clarity of the available and possible data for each factor, the pictures of the standards that appear to be useful and useful for evaluating the consideration of evidence are eight. We will examine these elements in these scales and note how close the scale comes to theory and probability. We will divide the researched evidence into two parts: The first: What has an authenticated Qur’anic origin and we symbolize it (and) and it always takes the number (1). It is strongly probabilistic and positive in theory, which will represent the model. The second: that which has no authentication from the Qur’an, and we symbolize it (kh) and it always takes the number (2).

Eight standards were examined on five diverse legal issues. In terms of evaluating consideration, the standards are close, but failure occurred in the first, second, and seventh standards. Therefore, the remaining criteria are weighted from this perspective. Scale 5 and Scale 8 are the highest in the legal differences, followed by Scale 4. The weight is given to them over the rest.

Measures 1, 2, and 7 are inefficient compared to the rest of the measures. Scales 5 and 8 are the highest in terms of differences, so they outweigh the others.

The fifth criterion prevails over the eighth for several reasons: The first: It is the most famous and strongest evidence of presentation, that is, the command to introduce the Qur’an. Secondly: Disagreement is rare in the Qur’anic text and cannot be claimed in the sense that pragmatics is strong in it, unlike the conscience that can be claimed. Third: It is easier for the general public.

Hence, the criterion adopted in the presentation is the fifth criterion (the criterion of agreement with the Qur’an), and this is what corresponds to the Sunni text authenticated by the Qur’an.